К основному контенту

Dispose pattern to file reading in C#:

This is how to implement dispose pattern to file reading in C#:

using System;
using System.IO;

class BaseResource: IDisposable
{
// Track whether Dispose has been called.
private bool disposed = false;

// The unmanaged resource wrapper object
private FileStream file;

// Class constructor
public BaseResource(String fileName)
{
Console.WriteLine("BaseResource constructor allocates unmanaged resource wrapper");
file = new FileStream(fileName, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.Read);
}

// Implement IDisposable
public void Dispose()
{
// Check to see if Dispose has already been called.
if (!disposed)
{
Console.WriteLine("Dispose pattern releases unmanaged resource wrapper's resource");
file.Close();
disposed = true;
}
}

public void Close()
{
Dispose();
}

public void DoSomething()
{
Console.WriteLine("In BaseResource.DoSomething");
}
}

Also in some ways, calling Dispose() or Close() multiple times is completely harmless. However, this implementation of the dispose pattern is not thread-safe. Another thread could start disposing the object after the unmanaged resource wrappers are disposed, but before the internal disposed field is set to true. If you were writing a class for use in a multi-threaded application and were ensuring the class was thread-safe then this is how you would do it for the Dispose() method. The following modification to Dispose() remedies this by locking the object for the method's duration to prevent any other threads calling Dispose() at the same time.

Here is the C# rewrite:

// Implement IDisposable
public void Dispose()
{
lock(this)
{
// Check to see if Dispose has already been called.
if (!disposed)
{
Console.WriteLine("Dispose pattern releases unmanaged resource wrapper's resource");
file.Close();
disposed = true;
}
}
}
Source: http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/29365

Комментарии

Популярные сообщения из этого блога

Catastrophic backtracking в регулярных выражениях

Можно ли простой и вроде невинной регуляркой убить систему? Да, можно. Например: >>> r = '(a+)*b' Просто — да. Невинно — вроде да. Конечно неумно, потому что скобки и звездочка лишние, но должно работать. Попробуем: >>> re.findall('(a+)*b', 'aaaaaab') ['aaaaaa'] Круто, работает, пошли пить пиво. А нет… Если строка, в которой ищем, не будет содержать искомого паттерна, например просто 'aaaaaa', компилятор будет пробовать найти её следующим алгоритмом: 1. Вся стока удовлетворяет 'a+', но мы не находим 'b', шаг назад. 2. Теперь 'a+' удовлетворяет только 'aaaaa' (все, кроме последней), последняя удовлетворяет повтору '*', 'b' все равно не находим, шаг назад. 3. Первое 'a+' удовлетворяет только 'aaaa', последние два 'aa' удовлетворяют повтору '*', 'b' все равно не находим, шаг назад. 4. Первое 'a+' удовлетворяет 'aa...

Implementing Singleton in C# (Применение Одиночки в C#)

You are building an application in C#. You need a class that has only one instance, and you need to provide a global point of access to the instance. You want to be sure that your solution is efficient and that it takes advantage of the Microsoft .NET common language runtime features. You may also want to make sure that your solution is thread safe. Implementation Strategy Even though Singleton is a comparatively simple pattern, there are various tradeoffs and options, depending upon the implementation. The following is a series of implementation strategies with a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses. Singleton The following implementation of the Singleton design pattern follows the solution presented in Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software [Gamma95] but modifies it to take advantage of language features available in C#, such as properties: using System; public class Singleton { private static Singleton instance; private Singleton...

Выпущена новая версия Kinect for Windows SDK, новый сайт и блог для разработчиков

Выпущена новая версия Kinect for Windows SDK, новый сайт и блог для разработчиков Если дойдут руки - обязательно попробую)